@Henning is right. I'm kicking myself for the last few wasted years of Domino development. The fact that IBM decided to withdraw Garnet leaving us with @formulas as the only way to get any kind of performance out a Domino web application, should have told us that Domino was not meant to be a serious contender as a web development platform. That they even chose not to provide a re-director to Tomcat, shows that they only route they expected us to take was to move to Websphere, or choose another platform instead of Domino. The irony is that once I'd found how flexible other web development tools could be, I also saw how they could be used to replace Domino's RAD capabilities for non-web applications.
@Henning is right. I'm kicking myself for the last few wasted years of Domino development. The fact that IBM decided to withdraw Garnet leaving us with @formulas as the only way to get any kind of performance out a Domino web application, should have told us that Domino was not meant to be a serious contender as a web development platform. That they even chose not to provide a re-director to Tomcat, shows that they only route they expected us to take was to move to Websphere, or choose another platform instead of Domino. The irony is that once I'd found how flexible other web development tools could be, I also saw how they could be used to replace Domino's RAD capabilities for non-web applications.