New Response

« Return to the main article

You are replying to:

    • avatar
    • Jake Howlett
    • Posted on Thu 14 Mar 2002

    Afraid I've got to say I did that too ;-)

    If you look through the version history of all the availble versions (bottom of the article) I think it's v1.5 that used the field's ID to do just the same thing.

    I got rid of this so as to improve the chances of it working in Netscape.

    I also find it easier to see which are the required fields when in an array versus having to look through the attributes of every field.

    Nice to see other people thinking along the same line though. You know what they say about great minds ... ;-)

    Jake -codestore

Your Comments