Was definately worth the wait, and hopefully more people will take this
approach in their development.
One question however (didn't think you'd get away with nothing but fluff
right?!?): Why not name the view "styles.css", then "$$ViewTemplate for
styles.css" and make you links simply "styles.css"?
I know I've never run into an issue where a call to "styles.css" didn't open
the view as intended... and it would make for a smoother and more
standards-based look and feel (would also validate etc). Am I seriously
missing something, as I've done this in my own dev without an event (yet?)?!?
Was definately worth the wait, and hopefully more people will take this approach in their development.
One question however (didn't think you'd get away with nothing but fluff right?!?): Why not name the view "styles.css", then "$$ViewTemplate for styles.css" and make you links simply "styles.css"?
I know I've never run into an issue where a call to "styles.css" didn't open the view as intended... and it would make for a smoother and more standards-based look and feel (would also validate etc). Am I seriously missing something, as I've done this in my own dev without an event (yet?)?!?
Also, thanks for the nod Jake! :-D
-Chris