<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"> 
<channel>
<title>CodeStore.net comments on "Notes 8 Beta Preview"</title>
<description>Replies to blog "Notes 8 Beta Preview" on codestore.net.</description>
<link>http://www.codestore.net/</link>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 05:15:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
<atom:link href="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/blog.xml?Open=20050627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
	<title>Reply from Greg Evans</title>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 05:15:00 +0100</pubDate>
	<author>Greg Evans</author>
	<description><![CDATA[ 
		<p>Gojal's reply is encouraging in one sense: that they are endevouring to achieve the "right" solution.</p>
		<p>Referring to the improvements in e-Mail, Cal, etc. I think it's a bit late to get serious in this area. If only they had got really serious with ND6 and marketed the hell out of it as an e-Mail and Cal solution. Whilst the subject is dull the reason for picking Notes usually starts with its e-Mail functionality.</p>

		<p><a href="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/reply?OpenForm&ParentUNID=8135DD82AFFD64D08625702E00385AEB"><img border="0" src="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/images/rss_reply.gif" alt="Click here to post a response" /></a></p>
	]]></description>
	<link>http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/unid/BLOG-20050627?OpenDocument#DOC_8135DD82</link>
</item><item>
	<title>Reply from Axel.Janssen</title>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:54:00 +0100</pubDate>
	<author>Axel.Janssen</author>
	<description><![CDATA[ 
		<p>We can start a European Contest: Most weirdest IBM announcement regarding Workplace in our respective countries. </p>
		<p>Here's german candidate </p>
		<p>(my own translation from vowe interviewing Ambuj Gojal, published in a german it-mag): </p>
		<p>VW: Are you going to integrate eclipse in notes or is it the other way round? At least, Eclipse is a framework for itself?</p>
		<p>(this is a weird question, but now answer--&gt; :-))</p>
		<p>Gojal: You mean, what will be the container and what the Component? We still don't know. Should a view be a notes view and eclipse is the interaction-mechanism. Or shall Eclipse show the view and notes provides the data. Both is possible. The team works on both solutions. Its the result that matters: You are going to be able to run existing notes-applications out of the box.</p>
		<p>:-)</p>

		<p><a href="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/reply?OpenForm&ParentUNID=886E0B1A408DA2AD8625702D005CEAB8"><img border="0" src="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/images/rss_reply.gif" alt="Click here to post a response" /></a></p>
	]]></description>
	<link>http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/unid/BLOG-20050627?OpenDocument#DOC_886E0B1A</link>
</item><item>
	<title>Reply from Ken A Collins</title>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:43:00 +0100</pubDate>
	<author>Ken A Collins</author>
	<description><![CDATA[ 
		<p>I agree with Jake.  There is a slew of usability improvements I'd like to see in Designer, yet every time Lotus announces what's coming in the next release (R7 now and I imagine the same when R8 beta is under way) all they talk about are changes to e-mail and calendaring.  Groan!!  </p>
		<p>Ken  </p>

		<p><a href="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/reply?OpenForm&ParentUNID=DEC571F8CF7C63B68625702D00566625"><img border="0" src="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/images/rss_reply.gif" alt="Click here to post a response" /></a></p>
	]]></description>
	<link>http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/unid/BLOG-20050627?OpenDocument#DOC_DEC571F8</link>
</item><item>
	<title>Reply from Brian Green</title>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
	<author>Brian Green</author>
	<description><![CDATA[ 
		<p>I'm really looking forward to the Eclipse-based tools.  My only concern so far -- I hope there's still a robust @Formula language for "power users".  They shouldn't need a computer science degree to create simple applications.  That's a strength in Lotus Notes today!</p>

		<p><a href="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/reply?OpenForm&ParentUNID=F04553BBE5C48E9C8625702D00553A37"><img border="0" src="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/images/rss_reply.gif" alt="Click here to post a response" /></a></p>
	]]></description>
	<link>http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/unid/BLOG-20050627?OpenDocument#DOC_F04553BB</link>
</item><item>
	<title>Reply from Stephan H. Wissel</title>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:13:00 +0100</pubDate>
	<author>Stephan H. Wissel</author>
	<description><![CDATA[ 
		<p>No lah!</p>
		<p>Good move....</p>
		<p>My personal bet: R7 will see the end of the standalone Domino Designer. R8 Designer will be an Eclipse plug-in (I hope) or a Rational Developer plug-in (Eclipse superset, I guess). Finally a class browser, a superior code editor, a world class debugger.</p>
		<p>For the UI: head over to Eclipse 3.1 and learn RCP. And that doen't stand for "Real Cluttered Programs". Can't wait to get started.</p>
		<p>:-) stw</p>

		<p><a href="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/reply?OpenForm&ParentUNID=C1A192587B4DBE8B8625702D004E187D"><img border="0" src="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/images/rss_reply.gif" alt="Click here to post a response" /></a></p>
	]]></description>
	<link>http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/unid/BLOG-20050627?OpenDocument#DOC_C1A19258</link>
</item><item>
	<title>Reply from Scott Freeman</title>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:07:00 +0100</pubDate>
	<author>Scott Freeman</author>
	<description><![CDATA[ 
		<p>Whats with all the new interfaces being basic clones of Microsoft Office 2003?  Far, far, far too much blue.</p>
		<p>And all those windows and stuff - seems to be too complex just for the sheer heck of it to me.</p>
		<p>Bah, I say.</p>

		<p><a href="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/reply?OpenForm&ParentUNID=8710182F7AC1C7038625702D003D2510"><img border="0" src="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/images/rss_reply.gif" alt="Click here to post a response" /></a></p>
	]]></description>
	<link>http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/unid/BLOG-20050627?OpenDocument#DOC_8710182F</link>
</item><item>
	<title>Reply from Brett</title>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 05:57:00 +0100</pubDate>
	<author>Brett</author>
	<description><![CDATA[ 
		<p>With “Hannover” we’re expanding the Lotus Notes programming model in a way that allows components from other applications — or components created with J2EE or other development tools — to run within the Lotus Notes client, surrounded by the core Lotus Notes collaborative capabilities. In so doing we’re enabling a brand new class of Lotus Notes business applications.”</p>
		<p>This comment seems interesting and spotting a screenshot with a graph in it looks promising..Would be good to get some good charts, gantts, and visual widgets without relying on the yucky applet / java support in the currently releases..</p>

		<p><a href="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/reply?OpenForm&ParentUNID=A1038792CF7513798625702D003C33F1"><img border="0" src="http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/images/rss_reply.gif" alt="Click here to post a response" /></a></p>
	]]></description>
	<link>http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/unid/BLOG-20050627?OpenDocument#DOC_A1038792</link>
</item>

</channel>
</rss> 
