CodeStore.net comments on "Lost Rich Text Images, The Solution"

Reply from jef

jef — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 05:56:00 +0100

it works!

Reply from Jake

Jake — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:12:00 +0100

Thanks Louis. I just gave this a go but it didn't solve the problem.

Reply from Louis

Louis — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:06:00 +0100

All men from the British Isles need a library, it is in your genes.

I went to a work working show a few months back a saw this guy {Link} He does by hand what machines costing hundreds if not thousands do. It real was an inspiration for me. So, signed up for several work working class - next one is on how to use hand planes. My fist project was to made a general workbench - did it all the joint cutting by hand with a saw, chisel, and plane. Not perfect, but nice for first try. Plus it was very relaxing.

My guess is that if you and your dad tackle the bookcase you will fine it very rewarding, not to mention that you will get to spent some quality time with the old man.

Good luck, and keep us posted.

Reply from Louis

Louis — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:43:00 +0100

IT WORKS!!! I'm always amazed at how effective simple solutions are. Now if I can only convince management that less is better a wonderful world it would be.

Reply from Fredrik

Fredrik — Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:14:00 +0100

Jake, did you try to use the richtextitem.update() method (new method in R6.5) in the wqo-agent? It might save you the processing of unwanted print documents that comes with the wqs approach.

I think it will force an update on your new richtextitem (just as save() does) and should be called after all rti operatons...

Reply from Mike

Mike — Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:15:00 +0100

A Domino app without any hackery. I can't wait to see it.

Reply from Patrick Niland

Patrick Niland — Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:05:00 +0100

Hi Jake...

Glad to see that you got your problem solved. As for the "iframes/DHTML hackery" that i posted, i'm sure it would have worked!.....

Just glad you mentioned my idea, no matter how much "hackery" it might have been!

Later

Patrick

P.S. Can't wait to see your new site!

Reply from Ben Langhinrichs

Ben Langhinrichs — Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:00 +0100

Well, that makes a lot more sense. It seemed unlikely that the images wouldn't get copied over. Glad to hear you got it sorted.

Reply from Michael

Michael — Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:36:00 +0100

Jake,

I have a 'library' room in my place with shelves on two walls much like that picture. Although I did not build them myself, I did modify the back corner of each shelf to have a 1/2" hole for running speaker wire for the surround sound system. I then hide the wires with some small modified 1/4 round and the speakers are in place. You have the benefit of starting fresh to you may want to incorporate some sort of a run for cabling if required. Our shelves are stained pine and we also have a faux beam crossing the room with the same stain.

That's my shelf story.

Good luck,

Michael